The reality of evil in our world appears to render liberals speechless; what the fuck is up with that? Seriously, these days they condemn me for not being tolerant of muslims and not feeling any sort of empathy for rapists, murderers, and child molesters. Regarding all the hateful and evil examples of innocent people being brutally victimized or murdered we see so often, this new breed of progressive liberals always seem to sympathize in some way with the perpetrator! When the fuck did it become this way, and why? For example, about a week after the bombing, Governor Deval Patrick, the governor of Massachusetts, who you think would be as pissed off as I am, gave a statement that was clouded by the liberal agenda-colored lens through which all seems to filter before these fucks can utter a sentence to the media:
“The governor of Massachusetts said Sunday that he has no idea what motivated the brothers accused of exploding two bombs near the finish line of the Boston Marathon.”
Really gov? You shoulda checked out the Boston Globe. They were close; they thought Islam might have played a “secondary” role!
Then on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” good ole Deval said it’s hard to imagine why someone would deliberately harm “innocent men, women and children in the way that these two fellows did.”
What the fuck is with that bland unhelpful observation? Who was it meant for? Where the fuck have you been Deval…”all” of history shows that some people do, indeed, want to harm innocent men, women and children in this fashion…and “recent” history shows that American innocents are a prime target! What a douche canoe this governor is. World-wide, muslims alone carry out on the average, several terrorist attacks a day for the purpose of harming innocent men, women and children, and they are by no means the only source of evil in the world. So our public officials of the liberal persuasion should stop expressing amazement at the existence of evil and start figuring out how to protect the rest of us from it. Don’t they have families too?
I could go on and on; I have, in fact, and will continue to do in other rants. The rest of this rant will focus on an article that appeared in The Atlantic, written just 4 days after the bombing. It’s a great example of the bullshit mushy liberal commentary that had proliferated in the days after the tragedy. Authored by one Megan Garber, it is titled: “The Boston Bombers Were Muslim: So?; Why we turn to labels in times of crisis – and why we should stop”. Doesn’t the title just make you want to punch her right in the face, or is it just me? Hell, since she feels that way, she can just save that file, change a few words here and there, and use it over and over. Just think of the form letter type articles she could have already written: “The Cole Bombers Were Muslim: So?”; “The Benghazi Attackers Were Muslim: So?”; “The First World Trade Center Bombers Were Muslim: So?”; “The 9/11 Bombers Were Muslim: So?”; “The Madrid Bombers Were Muslim: So?”; “The London Bombers Were Muslim: So?”; “The Shoe Bomber Was Muslim: So?”; “ The Underwear Bomber Was Muslim: So?”; “The Fort Hood Shooter Was Muslim: So?”; “The Times Square Bomber Was Muslim: So?”
If it doesn’t make you ill, now you can enjoy some of Ms. Garber’s idiotic rambling from her Atlantic Article.
“Here is what we know — or what we think we know — about Tamerlan Tsarnaev: He was a boxer and a gifted athlete. He did not smoke or drink — God said no alcohol — and didn’t take his shirt off in public so girls don’t get bad ideas. He was very religious. He had a girlfriend who was half-Portuguese and half-Italian. In 2009, he was arrested after allegedly assaulting his girlfriend. He was a nice guy. He was also a cocky guy. He was also a normal guy. He loved the movie Borat. He wanted to become an engineer, but his first love was music: He studied it in school, playing the piano and the violin. He didn’t have American friends, he said — I don’t understand them— but he also professed to appreciate the U.S. (America has a lot of jobs …. You have a chance to make money here if you are willing to work). He was training, as a boxer, to represent the U.S. in the Olympics.
We know, or we think we do, that Tamerlan’s brother, Dzhokar, is very quiet. Having graduated from the Cambridge Rindge and Latin School — a public school known for its diverse student body — he received a scholarship from the City of Cambridge. He went to his prom, with a date and in a tux. He had friends. He posed with them, smiling, at graduation. He tweeted pictures of cats. He skateboarded around his Cambridge neighborhood. His personal priorities, he has said, are career and money. He is a second-year medical student at U Mass Dartmouth. He is seemingly Chechan by birth and Muslim by religion, and has lived in the U.S. since 2002. He is a true angel. He has uncles in Maryland. He called one of them yesterday and said, Forgive me.
These are provisional facts. They are the products of the chaos of breaking news, and may well also be the products of people who stretch the truth — or break it — in order to play a role in the mayhem. They are very much subject to change. But they are also reminders of something it’s so easy to forget right now, especially for the many, many members of the media — professional and otherwise — who currently find themselves under pressure of live air or deadline: Tamerlan and Dzhokar Tsarnaev are not simply the Marathon bombers, or murderers, or Chechens, or immigrants, or Muslims. They might turn out to be all of those things. They might not. The one thing we know for sure is that they are not only those things.”
Sure! We certainly can’t let them be defined in the public mind by the fact that they were mass-murdering, scumbag, evil, terrorists; they were “so” much more complicated than that! Hell, besides all that “bad stuff” they were nice young men according to her!
My take on Ms. Garber: “A fuckin nitwit, head in the clouds (or up her ass), kumbaya signing, other-worldly elitist bitch!”
“They had friends and families and lives. They had YouTube accounts and Twitter feeds. They went to class. They went to work. They came home, and they left it again.”
Blah, blah, blah, fuckin blah! So fucking what! How can it be that what goes on inside her head is sooo radically different from what goes on in mine????? I not only have no tolerance for murderers, rapists and muslims (btw, muslims are also murderers and rapists); I have no tolerance for wrong-minded thinking. No, I’m not saying that I have no tolerance for folks who have different points of view than me; I don’t claim to know everything and be right about everything. But I do know good and bad and right and wrong; and I definitely can identify bad people who are wrong in their daily thinking and actions!
The reason why any of us now know of these two terrorist fucks is that they stuffed pressure cookers full of ball bearings and sharp items, made a bomb out of them, and tried to murder as many people as they could. With all due respect to their Twitter feeds and such, that “does” seem to be the most important fact to know about them. Fuck all the fluffy stuff Ms. Garber; you’re not going to change the truth or my mind, so why bother!
“[W]e have entered the time in the cycle when, alleged culprits identified, our need for answers tends to merge with our need for justice. We seek patterns, so that we may find in them explanations. We confuse categories — male, Muslim — with cause. We focus on contradictions: He had a girlfriend, and killed people. She was a mother, and a murderer. And we finally take refuge in comforting binaries — dark-skinned or light-skinned, popular or loner, international or homegrown, good or evil — because their neat lines and tidy boxes would seem to offer us a way to do the thing we most crave right now: to put things in their place.
The problem is that there is no real place for the Boston bombings and their aftermath, just as there was no real place for Aurora or Columbine or Newtown. Their events were, in a very literal sense, outliers: They are (in the U.S., at least) out of the ordinary. They were the products of highly unusual sets of circumstances — of complexity, rather than contradictions.”
What a bunch of asinine shit this is: does anyone really talk this way - “seek patterns”; “confuse categories”; “focus on contradictions”; “take refuge in comforting binaries”??? This is the real world, we’re not between the covers of a fictional novel here, and we’re dealing with a real serious issue! Even if people did talk that way, Ms. Garber, please tell me who, in their need to seek justice, thinks of things in those terms…no one, ever; that’s who! Goddamn; it’s not supposed to be a fluff piece when you report on something like this! Arrrrgh; here comes that fuckin pain in my head again! I will agree with her on one thing here, which is the last sentence above: the average person would say; yes, terrorist attacks in the U.S. are relatively rare…BUT, that’s why they are front page news. The focus of our collective feelings, discussions, and reporting needs to be “how can we make them rarer still”! But, no; The Atlantic doesn’t descend into lowly practicality; it’s above that. It wants to demonstrate its elitism over people like me, who think in mundane, real world, unfiltered terms.
“But it’s that kind of conversion process — people into People — that led, this week, to the public fears that the bombers would turn out to be Muslim. It’s the process that led, two days ago, to headlines like ‘In Boston Bombing, Muslims Hold Their Breath’ and ‘For Muslim Americans, Boston Bombings Bring Added Anxiety’ — and that led, this morning, to stories about Muslim leaders now ‘fearing a backlash.’ The sad assumption carried in these reports is that Americans lack the intellectual equipment and moral imagination to tell the difference between an individual and a group. It’s an assumption that has, in the past, occasionally proven valid.”
Ms. Garber I have something to say directly to you: Really? Really? It was “that kind of conversion process — people into People–” that caused many to fear that the bombers might be Muslims? First, what the fuck are you even saying; and b) whatever it fuckin is, I’m gonna have to disagree bitch. In answer to your questions “why were Muslims holding their breath,” and experiencing “added anxiety”: I’ll tell you why Ms. Fuckin Garber; because they, like me and very unlike liberal “journalists,” are willing to acknowledge that Islam is the main source of terrorism and mass murder in our time. Muslims, know more than anyone, that we see and despise their disrespect for human life and their lack of any measure of decency that is expected in human civilization. They have shown us many, many times their willingness and capability to commit cold blooded mass murders of anyone that has views different than theirs; which means “everyone else in the world”! That's fact, so shove “tolerance” up you're ass, you prude! Oh, that’s an unfair statement; we’re all supposed to be tolerant of them and not think any further or let it trouble us because you fucks know everything; whatever you tell us to do is for the greater good; and we should just obey. You believe that the government should have as much control of us as they see fit to ensure that people like me end up thinking like you; don’t you…you fuckin elitist twat! The concept of the “greater good” is quite compassionate isn’t it? I bet you get butterfly flutters in your stomach because you feel so proud of yourself; don’t you Ms. Garber? After all, in your mind, you don’t doubt your compassion and of course you are correct in your view of the world! You also know that everything this administration is doing right now is toward the philanthropic ends that your party believes in! But, have you ever in your fantasy-like life thought through what the greater good is? Have you defined it in anything other than abstract terms? Will you know it when you see it? Of course not Ms. fucking Garber, right? If you did, it would be as clear to you as it is to all right-minded people; there can be no good at all, let alone a “greater” good at the end of road that this administration is steering the country. What really pisses me off about you Ms. Garber is that you use your position as a so-called journalist to spew this unreal fluffy crap to the public. A lot of them out there are ignorant, but you already know that don’t you; you would NEVER say it, but you know it! And you use your position to influence these morons with "your" views rather than write objectively and encourage them to think for themselves; wow that is compassionate.
Ms. Garber, I have some news for you: YOU ARE BEING USED stupid! You don’t even know it! Do you think for a minute the imposter occupying the white house right now shares your views, just because he used them in his campaign? He has one and only one thing on his agenda and all the things he’s done or tried to do is toward that end; the destruction of the United Sates of America! He hates this country and he hates the white race and he supports terrorists who have made it known that they want to kill us! How does your brain work that you deny these facts about the anointed one? Real world Ms. Garber, real world…
Since being objective always seems to put liberalism in a bad light these days, this is the shit the public gets fed from their type of journalism. She actually says in this article that the fear that the bombers might turn out to be Muslims represents a “sad assumption” that “Americans lack the intellectual equipment and moral imagination to tell the difference between an individual and a group.” Don’t let the facts get in the way lady; they WERE muslims! What a fuckin uppity bitch! This statement of hers is arbitrary, unfounded and just plain stupid. No matter who she convinces of her “superiority”; she’s only proven to me that she’s a phony. Hey Ms. Garber, I think I might be on to something here: are you really stupid? Is “that” the reason you took up the liberal cause; because liberals will overlook something like stupidity as long as you claim their views as your own and are willing to write crap like this? I’ll bet you wanted to be a poet, huh; but weren’t good to enough to earn a living. Yes, I can see that!
Another thing Ms. Garber: I and other right-minded Americans possess “the intellectual equipment and moral imagination to discern correctly the relationships between individuals and groups”. In fact we can take it a step further; and correctly discern the relationships between individuals and any fanatical movements or criminal conspiracies of which they are a part. Common sense and logic is what I apply, you poser.
Now we come to the end of the “article”; the finale, where, if one were really a writer, it should all come together!
"Yet it’s also symptomatic of a tendency, in the media and beyond it, to privilege caricatures over characters."
I need to stop here for that sentence: isn’t “privilege” a noun, not a verb? Oh, she might be taking “journalistic” liberty here; like I do with my street slang, cursing, incorrect punctuation, etc…EXCEPT, that such “liberty” only applies to prose; not to journalism…it’s a fucking article about terrorists written in a magazine! I, myself can get away from the rules of grammar though…no, not because I’m a hypocrite; it’s not the “do as I say not as I do” syndrome going on here: it’s simply because I never claimed to be a writer! I am not a writer; something that should be obvious to anyone that made it this far into my rant. I’m a ranter…look “ranter” is not even a word and I used it; ha-ha! I rant about stupid people, stupid ideas, and stupid things. The fact that most (maybe all) of my rants include liberalism, socialism, communism, muslimism, and/or moronism “is not” coincidental at all!
Here's Ms Garber's big ending;
“Particularly when we have so much access to people’s interior lives through social media — this Twitter feed seems to be Dzhokar’s, and it is revealing — we have new license to think beyond categories (and metaphors, and stereotypes). We have new ways to bolster our categories — Muslim, Chechen, Caucasian — with the many caveats they deserve. The Tsarnaev brothers may have been Muslim, and that circumstance may have, in part, motivated them in their actions on Monday. They may have been Chechen. They may have been male. But that was not all they were. Their lives were like all of ours: full of small incongruities that build and blend to drive us in different directions. Another thing we think we know about the brothers is that they lived in the middle of one of America’s richest cities, near a gas station. And a retirement home. And an auto-body shop. And a really good cafe that serves homemade ice cream. As a place it is tranquil and gritty, urban and not at all. It is messy and busy and real.
One day, the brothers left it for Boston. And to understand why they did that — to have even a prayer of progressing towards a world where two more young men don’t do that — we have to embrace complexity.”
Go ahead, read it again; I did…a few times. Is this incomprehensible or what? This country is full of people whose lives, like those of the Tsarnaev brothers, are “full of small incongruities,” and who live close to auto body shops, gas stations, retirement homes, and cafes that serve homemade ice cream. Yet none of those Americans feel an irresistible urge to fill a pressure cooker full of ball bearings, make it into a bomb, and detonate it, with the express purpose of killing or maiming as many “real” people as they can. The distinguishing feature of this or any article about these two should be that they "are evil bombers"; nevermind this dribble about homemade ice cream and such! How did she not conclude that? “Embrace complexity,”??? Am I supposed to have a clue what that means? Sorry, I don’t, but if she means that we should let the surviving brother who committed this latest muslim atrocity, or anyone who might have been in on it with them, off the hook, then I say she’s nothing more than a typical clueless, brainwashed, liberal fuck. I really don’t think that she actually has any idea what she’s saying in this last ramble; so I/we couldn’t be expected to either! It’s like something a student aspiring to be a writer would submit…to her "high school" teacher!
So, “we the people” get chastised when we reach what would be considered the logical or obvious conclusion to the issues surrounding this tragedy; yet “not” concluding anything, but rather stringing gibberish, nonsensical words together as if one were authoring beatnik/abstract poetry is seen as normal by those self-proclaimed intellectually superior, liberal dumbasses, like Ms. Garber. I wonder if these libtards purposefully behave this way in a lame attempt to obfuscate the reality of any given issue when it does not agree with their twisted view of the world. Or, are they so far gone that they aren’t being malicious at all and they actually believe that their double speak makes perfect sense? I’d like to think that it’s the latter: a mental health issue commonly linked to individuals possessing the liberal gene. If it’s the former then this new brand of progressive, socialistic, communistic liberals are, in fact, evil and hateful beings and that being the case; they should be eradicated!
No comments:
Post a Comment